Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 16:49
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Should India conduct another air strike to attack Pakistan over the Pahalgam attack?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Fed's Powell brings blunt message to Congress on interest rates this week - TheStreet
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Olfactory neurons use unexpected 'solid' clusters to achieve genetic precision - Phys.org
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Former Packers WR makes long touchdown in UFL championship - Acme Packing Company
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
According to Trump, Ukraine started the war. Why?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Utah health officials monitoring potential measles exposure in southwestern Utah - KSL.com